div0 wrote:
> On 27/10/2010 20:36, sergk wrote:
>> class Foo(T) {
>> this(T t) {
>> bar = t;
>> }
>> T bar;
>> }
>>
>> void main() {
>> auto a = new Foo(123); // doesn't work
>> auto b = new Foo!(int)(123); // work, but redundant
>> }
>>
>> Is there any technical limitations preventing this, or its just a
>> compiler bug?
>
> It's not a bug.
>
> I guess it could be a short cut, but it can only ever work when the
> class has exactly one constructor, which seems a bit of a pointless
> short cut and adds an unneccassiry corner case to the language spec.
>
Why would it only be able to work when there is exactly one
constructor? Doesn't function overloading work with templates?
This works here:
void foo(T) (T x) {
}
void foo(T, U) (T x, U y) {
}
void main()
{
foo (3);
foo (3, "azerty");
}
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
