On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 15:58:51 +0100, Don wrote: > Jesse Phillips wrote: >> I thought there was a Bug report on this, but I guess not. I say report >> it. Ether it should compile or the compiler should error that a >> constructor can not be nothrow. > > This has already been fixed in svn, and will be in the next release. See > bug 3020. > nothrow is painful and limited in 2.050, but should be quite usable in > 2.051.
Great! Many thanks! This issue has greatly limited nothrow usage because 'new' is so common.
