The question is: what is their right to exist? Is there anything you can do with them you can't with string mixins (or vice versa)?
In the past template mixins were a neat special usecase of templates. Now
with the "mixin template()" syntax they've become a separate thing because
you can add special code for handling them, e.g. allowing them to add
constructors to classes.
- template mixins vs. string mixins Trass3r
- Re: template mixins vs. string mixins Simen kjaeraas
- Re: template mixins vs. string mixins Don
- Re: template mixins vs. string mixins div0
- Re: template mixins vs. string mixins Jacob Carlborg