On 16/11/2010 15:11, Nick Voronin wrote: <snip>
There is still correct but unexpected behaviour. I found this on bugtracker http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=199 The rationale was "I don't want to change this because it could break existing code, and there doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to do so." Well. :(
<snip>
True, but that does nothing to explain why it was defined this way in the first place.
Stewart.
