On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:33:56 -0500 bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote:
> >So, putting classes on the stack kind of negates the whole point of having > >both structs and classes in the first place.< > > This is false, the definition of D class instance doesn't specify where the > instance memory is allocated. For me, the important difference is that classes are referenced, while structs are plain values. This is a semantic distinction of highest importance. I would like structs to be subtype-able and to implement (runtime-type-based) polymorphism. Denis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- vit esse estrany ☣ spir.wikidot.com
