Jonathan M Davis: > typedef is definitely on the way out, so that's not a solution,
typedef is deprecated (because its semantics is not flexible enough and because it doesn't play well with object oriented language features), but I have a real need for something like it. Andrei has discussed about a Phobos-based typedef replacement (based on structs + alias this), but nothing concrete has come out yet. I hope to see something to solve problems like spir ones. > and it would be a pretty fragile one IMHO anyway. Please, explain better. Bye, bearophile
