On 3/31/20 9:41 AM, Superstar64 wrote:
On Tuesday, 31 March 2020 at 06:51:16 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
This doesn't only happen with null, you will notice that that function
will eventually not add anything if you only add values. This is
because by adding values you might reallocate the map at some other
place in memory and because it's not ref, the caller won't have the
map point to the new reference and still only have the old data.
Is the D spec wrong then? It says that associative arrays have reference
semantics.
https://dlang.org/spec/hash-map.html#construction_and_ref_semantic
It does have reference semantics, but just like any reference type
(pointer, class reference, etc), if it is initialized somewhere else,
that initialization does not come back to the original unless you use
ref semantics.
Easy to see with a pointer:
void foo(int *ptr)
{
ptr = new int(5);
}
void main()
{
int *p;
foo(p); // does not affect p
}
-Steve
