bearophile,
Thank you so much for all your help. It seems you're very into ASM.
I kept the D_InlineAsm_X86 in my code as you suggested. The code i gave here was
just an example. But my code's version implementation looks like this:
version(D_InlineAsm_X86)
{
// ASM Code.
}
else
{
// D code.
}
This results in a much robust code. You were right about it.
You are right too about the "load-load-load processing-processing-processing
store-store-store instead a load-processing-store load-processing-store
load-processing-store" thing. I'll modify my code to this model, though it will
require to move some elements to the stack but no big deal, i think this won't
hurt performance as it is designed to work this way.
-Does ASM kill inlining for the function where the asm block is present or for
the
whole compilation?
-In your opinion, How badly can be if function inlining is not present? some
docs
from the net: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/inline-functions.html
Cheers,
Heinz
