On Sunday, 19 April 2020 at 19:20:28 UTC, p.shkadzko wrote:
[snip]
well no, "assumeContiguous" reverts the results of the "transposed" and it's "a * a". I would expect it to stay transposed as NumPy does "assert np.all(np.ascontiguous(a.T) == a.T)".

Ah, you're right. I use it in other places where it hasn't been an issue.

I can do it with an allocation (below) using the built-in syntax, but not sure how do-able it is without an allocation (Ilya would know better than me).

/+dub.sdl:
dependency "lubeck" version="~>1.1.7"
dependency "mir-algorithm" version="~>3.7.28"
+/
import mir.ndslice;
import lubeck;

void main() {
auto a = [2.1, 1.0, 3.2, 4.5, 2.4, 3.3, 1.5, 0, 2.1].sliced(3, 3);
    auto b = a * a.transposed.slice;
}

Reply via email to