On Friday 04 February 2011 16:09:08 Sean Kelly wrote: > Adam Conner-Sax Wrote: > > 1) I couldn't get the synchronized class version (as opposed to using > > synchronized statements in the functions) to run. It would hang in odd > > ways. > > > > This may be related to a bug I reported earlier (and Sean was helpful > > enough > > > > to fix!) so this may be moot. > > 'synchronized' as a class label may not be implemented in the compiler yet. > I'd stick to explicitly labeling methods are 'synchronized' for now.
IIRC, according to TDPL, it's supposed to be the whole class or non if it, not a per-function thing. So, if that's not how it works at the moment, that it's another of the things that hasn't been fixed to match TDPL yet. - Jonathan M Davis
