On Monday, 15 June 2020 at 16:03:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Monday, 15 June 2020 at 13:17:11 UTC, Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
[snip]

Nah, I saw it. Well. My take on it has been ready for months but I had to wait for my employer's permission to publish it. They are very open-source friendly, and as a consequence there is a glut of requests for open-sourcing personal projects. I guess I am going to cancel my request...


Ah. I suppose that depends implementation/performance/feature differences...

No, it's just that they are essentially equivalent. I spent some time supporting InterfaceValues to immutable and const classes and objects. Not sure if he has that, I haven't played with tardy yet. OTOH I didn't bother with allocator support.


On the bright side, I just got authorized to contribute my work on function refraction (currently part of openmethods) to bolts. You can see it here: https://github.com/aliak00/bolts/pull/10

I saw when you mentioned it earlier. Though it hasn't been something I've needed as yet, it's good to know that it's there.

This allows the function mixins to work when they are in different modules, right? I don't see a test for that, but it might be useful to include such an example (I'm pretty sure

You mean an example with two modules?

I plan to write a D blog entry that walks through the pitfalls of cross-module mixing.

Atila's tardy makes use of a similar functionality when they are in different modules).

Actually we were in contact (and with Ali of course). I pointed him to the part of openmethods that creates functions. He has a 'refraction.d' too. I coined the term 'refraction'. ;-)

It's interesting that many of the examples for refract are like refract!(F, "F") or refract!(answer, "answer"). Would something like Function refract(alias fun, string localSymbol = __traits(identifier, fun))()
work for you?

Not at all :-D That would return a name in the caller module. In the mixture you want to use only local names, and navigate from there.

Maybe I should change all the examples, including the unit tests, to avoid giving the impression that the original function name is a good default for the localSymbol. In most cases it's not.


Reply via email to