On 10/2/20 9:32 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This seems like an oversight. But it's not impossible.
Thank you Steve. Is there any chance that this mechanism will ever be revised? Presumably it would require a DIP.
Just curry the information to the receiver. opDollar doesn't have to return a size_t.
This is indeed pretty clever; I would not have ever though to have opDollar return a non-integral value. This again suggests the whole thing needs to be revised, but this will work for now -- thanks again!
