On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 14:17:38 UTC, Rekel wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 16:13:50 UTC, Imperatorn wrote:
https://ibb.co/syQRs9v
I hope I'm not the only one that thinks 'designers and std lib
writers unable to name anything correctly' is kind of ironic.
And don't get me started on documentation return values.
Most of the statements are wrong too...
"Forgot null terminator": that is C, not C++.
"undecidable grammer": wrong, not context free != undecidable
"can't execute arbitrary functions at compile time": same as D,
more or less
"4732 features, but not a single one you actually want": wrong
again, C++20 has features that people would like to see in D
"unsatisfying standard library": not really, unless you need to
avoid exceptions
"template metaprogramming only capable of being understood by
mensa member": some aspects of C++20 metaprogramming is easier
than D
"multiple-inheritance hell": no idea what this means, MI is
usually used for the same as D interfaces
"iterators": and ranges...
Anyway, bashing C++ does not get D anywhere. At best it makes D
users look uninformed.
