On 1/28/21 2:16 AM, Anthony wrote:

> auto p = pipeProcess("ls");
> auto q = pipeProcess("cat", stdin = p.stdout); //it would be good to do

That would work if `cat` received the *contents* of the files (and with a "-" command line switch). Since `ls` produces file names, you would have to make the complete `cat` command line from `ls`'s output.

> Do I need to manually extract the output from pipes.stdin.readln

Seems to be so for the `ls | cat` case. But the following `find | grep` example shows how two ends of pipes can be connected:

import std.stdio;
import std.process;
import std.range;

// BONUS: Enable one of the following lines to enjoy an issue.
// version = bonus_bug;
// version = bonus_bug_but_this_works;

void main() {
  // Writes to 'a':
  auto a = pipe();
  auto lsPid = spawnProcess([ "find", "."], stdin, a.writeEnd);
  scope (exit) wait(lsPid);

  // Reads from 'a', writes to 'b':
  auto b = pipe();
auto catPid = spawnProcess([ "grep", "-e", `\.d$` ], a.readEnd, b.writeEnd);
  scope (exit) wait(catPid);

  version (bonus_bug) {
    // Fails with the following error.
    //
    // "/usr/include/dmd/phobos/std/typecons.d(6540): Error:
    // `"Attempted to access an uninitialized payload."`"
writefln!"Some of the D source files under the current directory:\n%-( %s\n%)"(
      b.readEnd.byLine);

  } else version (bonus_bug_but_this_works) {
    // Note .take at the end:
writefln!"Some of the D source files under the current directory:\n%-( %s\n%)"(
      b.readEnd.byLine.take(1000));

  } else {
    // The results are read from 'b':
    writeln(b.readEnd.byLine);
  }
}

I've discovered a strange issue, which can be observed by uncommenting the 'version = bonus_bug;' line above. But comment that one back in and uncomment the next line, now it works. (?)

Ali

Reply via email to