On 7/19/21 10:58 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I didn't check the implementation to verify this, but I'm pretty sure `break`, `continue`, etc., in the parallel foreach body does not change which iteration gets run or not.
`break` should be undefined behavior (it is impossible to know which loops have already executed by that point). `continue` should be fine.
Noted in the [docs](https://dlang.org/phobos/std_parallelism.html#.TaskPool.parallel):
Breaking from a parallel foreach loop via a break, labeled break, labeled continue, return or goto statement throws a ParallelForeachError.
I would say `continue` is ok (probably just implemented as an early return), but all those others are going to throw an error (unrecoverable).
-Steve
