Simen kjaeraas: > It's probably correct that _adDupT is not nothrow. It is also wrong > that it shouldn't be.
I was about to write a bug report regarding allowing dupping in nothrow
functions, because this is now allowed, and I think this is the same thing as
doing a dup:
nothrow void foo(int[] a) {
auto b = new int[a.length];
b[] = a[];
}
void main() {}
Bye,
bearophile
