On Sunday, 25 July 2021 at 05:10:32 UTC, someone wrote:
As you can see in the following code I cannot avoid to type the
public immutable enum structureLocations = [
r"BUE"d : typeLocation(r"arg"d, r"Buenos Aires"d, r"ART"d),
r"GRU"d : typeLocation(r"bra"d, r"São Paulo"d, r"BRT"d),
Coudln't you instead just do like
enum structureLoctations = {
BUE = typeLocation......,
GRU = typeLiocation....
}
?
Then you can build a runtime hash map if you need it in a static
constructor or use a binary search switch to convert from strings
and look up the id from reflection. It depends on the usage.
static foreach(
structureExchange sudtExchange;
structureExchanges.byKeyValue
) {
You can also try a normal foreach
foreach(k, v; structureExchanges) {
// use k and v
}
static foreach might work too but assocative arrays are weird
beasts that needs to exist all at run time or all at compile
time; they cannot cross the barrier and use one item for both.
But the built-in k,v instead of byKeyValue might help anyway.
