On Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 17:56:54 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 11:20:18 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
One way to get a very rough estimate is to take the square of
the current reduction (.reduced directory), and divide it by
the square of the original source.
I meant the square of the size of the respective directory.
(bytes / LOC / SLOC...)
One week later it is still running (depth 22).
If you are still on the first iteration, you may also try
switching to the "careful" strategy.
Thanks for the information.
I stopped dustMite and realized I must have done something wrong
since the reduced test case doesn't reproduce the problem.
I would really like to try and produce a reduced test case of
this problem. However having spent three or four hours trying to
figure out what I am doing wrong I think I will have to stop at
this point.
