On Wednesday, 10 November 2021 at 04:54:58 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 November 2021 at 11:03:09 UTC, forkit wrote:
They both produce exactly the same output.
But do vastly different things.
But I tell ya.. the cognitive load .. well.. it increased
dramatically ;-)
Of course it did. Cuz you overthunk it. Dramatically.
Your D version allocates memory, for no good reason. I mean, to
store results, but you already have storage for them, so kinda
pointless. Your C version, OTOH, stores results on stack (so
again, why did you allocate for them in D?..), but allocates
some "string builder" for... what, exactly?
The program is filter, or sort + partition. Requires 0
allocations in C or D.
And.. in any case, the take away from this thread should not be
about nonallocating coding, but rather the interesting comment
from the originl op..
"Wow! your code seem so nice, I like it although I don't know how
exactly it works."
