On Friday, 19 November 2021 at 15:46:41 UTC, Adam D Ruppe wrote:
The `destroy` function (as well as other class destruction)
will null out the whole vtable to help make use-after-free an
obvious error. Possible that happened to you.
So, a partial nulled table shouldn't exist, right? like this:
__vptr[0]: address
__vptr[1]: 0000000
__vptr[2]: address
__vptr[3]: address
__vptr[4]: address
__vptr[5]: address
...
Because 0 should point to the object instance and next offsets
are pointers to the member functions, correct?
