On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:36:04 +0100, Michel Fortin
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 2011-03-15 10:42:46 -0400, Magnus Lie Hetland <[email protected]>
said:
I've got a function template along these lines:
Foo!T foo(T)(T[] bar, real function(T,T) baz) { ... }
The main reason I'm using this is that it seems necessary to use a
function, rather than a type (such as Foo), if you want the compiler to
deduce the compile-time parameters. (Right?)
Now ... this works just fine. However, if I try to add "const" before
"T[]", DMD no longer groks it. Is that how it shold be? Seems awkward
to me... (Or maybe I'm just doing it wrong?)
I'd say add it to bugzilla. It's probably related to this bug:
<http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5531>
Oh, it's much older than that:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2128
--
Simen
