On Friday, 21 January 2022 at 17:25:20 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Ouch! I tried the following code, my laptop got very hot, it's
been centuries, and it's still running! :p
:)
```d
size_t length() inout {
auto len = 1 + (last - first) / step;
return cast(size_t)len;
}
```
Does that not return 1 for an empty range?
Yes, but it will never return an empty range:
```d
enum e = 1;
auto o = inclusiveRange(e, e); // only one element
assert(!o.empty);
assert(o.length == e);
assert(o.equal([e]));
```
Additionally, just because we *provide* a step, now we
*require* division from all types (making it very cumbersome
for user-defined types).
I don't quite understand what you mean?
Salih
