On 1/29/22 10:04, Salih Dincer wrote:
> Could you also try the following code with the same configurations?
The program you posted with 2 million random values:
ldc 1.9 seconds
gdc 2.3 seconds
dmd 2.8 seconds
I understand such short tests are not definitive but to have a rough
idea between two programs, the last version of my program that used
sprintf with 2 million numbers takes less time:
ldc 0.4 seconds
gdc 0.5 seconds
dmd 0.5 seconds
(And now we know gdc can go about 7% faster with additional command line
switches.)
Ali
