On Saturday, 12 February 2022 at 20:31:29 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 06:41:14PM +0000, Era Scarecrow via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
[...]
That was not my point. My point was to question whether the OP
has discovered the insight that would allow him to accomplish
his task with a LOT less space than the naïve approach of
storing everything in a gigantic array. Substituting an AA for
a gigantic array matters little as long as the basic approach
remains the same -- you have only modified the implementation
details but the algorithm is still a (highly) suboptimal one.
--T
thanks, you are all correct. i just change the algorithm and use
the AA, previously using the naïve method...:), now solved
perfectly. thanks again.
