On Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 04:59:49 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
You could also specialize on `void*`, as that's the type that was failing to compile
I meant "instead", not also.
Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn Mon, 28 Feb 2022 21:58:38 -0800
On Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 04:59:49 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
You could also specialize on `void*`, as that's the type that was failing to compile
I meant "instead", not also.