On Monday, 14 March 2022 at 19:05:41 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Yes, better but not much: 37 seconds vs. 50+ seconds on my
system.
Even though I am pretty sure the OP has access to the keys and
the values separately, if it helps, I used the following code
to separate the keys and values:
[snip]
shared static this() {
cp949_table = make_cp949_table();
}
Yeah, dmd's -O performance with those tables is still very poor.
Ali
Thank you for this. This works although I could not reach the
same speed as you. I wonder if people with less memory as me (16
GB) will still be able to compile it.
DMD (DMD64 D Compiler v2.098.1)
```
$ time dub test --compiler=dmd --build=release
real 2m11,438s
user 2m11,134s
sys 0m0,153s
```
LDC (LDC - the LLVM D compiler (1.26.0): based on DMD v2.096.1
and LLVM 7.0.1)
```
$ time dub test --compiler=ldc2 --build=release
real 0m18,466s
user 0m18,099s
sys 0m0,151s
```
But this is definitely better than failing with an error. I have
not yet tried the -lowmem flag. I'll try that later.
I think I'll use your solution for now as that works and
hopefully people won't have to recompile everything so often.
Usually this should just get compiled once and be good with it :)
