On Saturday, 23 July 2022 at 20:00:06 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
A bit more d-ified and uses foreach + foreach_reverse without allocating an array.[...]
Thanks for the quick reply.I also get your results, it is not correct because the secends number is not matched.
Not I look at your number, I find out just need change `a[index] = cast(ubyte) i;` to `a[m-index] = cast(ubyte) i;` will get the expect results.
Thanks for the help.
