Re: Is this a violation of const?

[ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On 30.07.22 09:15, Salih Dincer wrote:

It's possible to do this because it's immutable.  You don't need an extra update() function anyway.

```d
void main()
{
     auto s = S("test A");
     s.update = (_) { s.s = _; };

     s.update("test B");
     assert(s.s == "test B");

     s.s = "test C";
     assert(s.s == "test C");
} // No compile error...
```

You're not making sense. Your `s` is mutable, not immutable.