On 8/17/22 19:27, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 8/17/22 10:09 PM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> > IIRC, your data does not need to be sequential in *physical memory*,
>> > which means you can use a ring buffer that is segmented instead of
>> > virtually mapped, and that can be of any size.
>>
>> I thought about that as well. But I would like the sizes of blocks
>> (Appenders?) be equal in size so that opIndex still can provide O(1)
>> guarantee. (Compute the block + an offset.)
>
> It's still O(1). You only have 2 slices to worry about.
Sometimes 2... I wanted to leave the sliding window width dynamic.
So, there will be M buffers, not 2. If their lengths are not equal,
opIndex must be O(M). M is expected to be small but still...
M buffers of 'pageSize - (meta data).sizeof' each.
BeerConf... Sure... :)
Ali
