Re: is it possible synchronized(null) ? i.e NO-OP

[Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn]

On the main forum, Paul Backus proposed a nested function as well as a 
scoped lock.

On 8/26/22 10:13, mw wrote:
>    Object lock = (a particular condition) ? realLock : null;

And I want to point out that "a particular condition" must not change 
between the check above and the following synchronized statement.

>
>    synchronized(lock) {
>      // lots of complex code block here
>    }

Ali