On 9/5/22 01:58, anonymouse wrote: > array [1.7, 3.7, 5.7, 7.7, 9.7] in both cases, which is what is being > asserted by those two lines.
None of those values can be represented precisely in a floating point type. Without looking at the code, I wonder whether the tests will pass if you can manage to use the following values instead, which can be represented precisely:
[1.5, 3.5, 5.5, 7.5, 9.5] Ali
