On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 01:32:44PM +0000, matheus via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a design question and I'd like to hear some advice. Let's say
> that I want to create a method to sort an array:
>
> arr.sort(asc);
>
> I think usually this would usually return a new set of that array but
> now sorted.
No, it does not. It sorts `arr` in-place.
> But If I want to do this in the original, I think I would do this:
>
> arr.sort(asc).save();
That's not necessary, the .save is completely redundant.
[...]
> By the way in this design I'd like to have both options, return a new
> set and/or change the original.
If you want a new sorted array without touching the original, do this
instead:
auto sortedArr = arr.dup.sort();
T
--
They say that "guns don't kill people, people kill people." Well I think the
gun helps. If you just stood there and yelled BANG, I don't think you'd kill
too many people. -- Eddie Izzard, Dressed to Kill
