On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 05:17:06 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
if you are able to ignore that Unicode is a thing, I'd recommend it. It is complicated, as we humans are very complicated ;)

I can't ignore Unicode, because I frequently have to deal with Cyrillic alphabet ;) Also Unicode is significantly simpler than a set of various incompatible 8-bit encodings (such as [CP1251](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1251) vs. variants of [KOI-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KOI-8) vs. [ISO/IEC 8859-5](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_8859-5)) that were simultaneously in use earlier and caused a lot of pain. But I'm surely able to ignore the peculiarities of modern Turkish Unicode and wait for the other people to come up with a solution for D language if they really care.

Reply via email to