On Friday, 4 November 2022 at 14:11:55 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Friday, 4 November 2022 at 10:57:12 UTC, Hipreme wrote:
...
I disagree completely with being against package.d.
Having used D for like a decade at this point, I've never
experienced any issues with it.
Most issues seems to be for newcomers and people who aren't
entirely familiar with how D modules and packages work.
package.d is absolutely essential in some cases.
Literally my linker error disappeared after I changed it to
another name.
And I can't see how essential package.d is, there's no D
difference in the code written.
As it being the exception inside our compiler, it is an entire
pool for bugs to get wild out there.
