On 30/12/2022 6:37 PM, Salih Dincer wrote:
On Friday, 30 December 2022 at 04:54:39 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
So when you duplicated it, it was no longer in ROM, and therefore
writable.
There is no such thing as a ROM within a function.
But a function can reference things in ROM, and a function itself can
and should be held within ROM.
Because str is a
reference and slc is a local copy, right?
It is a reference to memory that is in ROM. No, it is not a copy of the
memory, only of the reference.
You shouldn't be casting away immutable btw, (which is what string is!).
Have you tried running the
code? Okay, no string literals:
Of course; I cannot see anything else that could cause this in the
assembly either.
