On 16/04/2023 1:20 AM, kdevel wrote:
On Saturday, 15 April 2023 at 12:45:31 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
It was bad analysis by the compiler, which has since been corrected.
It should have been applied only to @safe code.
But why is the @unsafe programmer now left unprotected in cases like this
```
ref int foo (ref int i)
// `------- automatically insert `return` here?
{
return i;
}
```
where the compiler recognizes that the function returns a ref parameter?
Under which circumstances is it a mistake to insert the `return` at the
indicated position? If there are none why can't it be done implicitly
(automatically)?
@system (which is currently the default, there is a strong desire to
change this), does no safety checks.
You are on your own to do whatever unsafe thing you want.
If you want safety checks, use @safe.
