On Wednesday, 13 December 2023 at 19:51:11 UTC, Adam D Ruppe
wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 December 2023 at 19:37:09 UTC, Siarhei
Siamashka wrote:
Now I'm curious. Is it possible to somehow communicate the
real source file name to `dmd`, so that it shows up in the
error log instead of "__stdin.d"?
the sequence `#line "filename.d" 1` at the top of the thing
might do what you need.
https://dlang.org/spec/lex.html#special-token-sequence
might also suggest putting a `module` declaration in the file.
Thanks a lot! Looks like it does the job:
```D
/+dub.sdl:+/ #line 2 "example.d"
import std;
void main() {
deliberate syntax error here
}
```
At least this way there's no undesired line numbers mismatch
between different ways to compile and run the same file:
```
$ dub example.d
example.d(4,14): Error: found `error` when expecting `;` or `=`,
did you mean `deliberate syntax = here`?
example.d(4,27): Error: found `}` when expecting `;` or `=`, did
you mean `error here = End of File`?
$ cat example.d | dmd -run -
example.d(4): Error: found `error` when expecting `;` or `=`, did
you mean `deliberate syntax = here`?
example.d(4): Error: found `}` when expecting `;` or `=`, did you
mean `error here = End of File`?
```
But the compiler command line doesn't provide any alternative
solutions to override the "__stdin.d" placeholder, right? My
primary concern is that the file name and the special token or
module directive have to match each other. And unless this is
reliably enforced, it may become an additional headache to worry
about.