On 04/26/2011 02:28 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Ok, so I guess statically linking against the stuff isn't the way to go, and
apparently DLL hell is worse on linux. Sooo...What do I do?
In the other thread, Spacen said: "The way to do this is to link against the
oldest libc you need to
support, thus making the binaries forward compatible"
I know my way around Linux as a user, but with deeper system stuff like that
I'm pretty much lost. I don't have a clue how to do what Spacen suggests or
how to determine what version of libc I need. Can anyone help me out with
that?
Can you backup, and help me understand what the first problem was? The
one you thought was solvable by statically linking against glibc?
-Kai Meyer
