On Saturday, 5 October 2024 at 16:40:46 UTC, Salih Dincer wrote:
On Saturday, 5 October 2024 at 06:35:57 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
No, i don't want to do:
```C
struct EntityDef
{
struct Stats
{
int hp;
} stats;
}
```
Repeating the same name 3 times, i should go back to the stone
age too no?
C and all other C like languages allow me to be concise
Why is it a D thing to be backward?
In the coding scheme, fields/members/methods may be at the
beginning, middle, or end of the structure, or may not be
identifiers to the right of the anonymous structs. In
structures, a lot (I wish it was in bitfield) has been taken
from C. Especially not using typedef and not having extra
semicolons make D stand out even with these. As for anonymous
structures, they have to be like this in order to be used with
unions.
I think everything is as it should be, and even more: Please
include the relevant comment line (the // characters next to
the anonymous struct) in the code and be amazed by the change :)
```d
struct Foo
{
int bar;
//struct {/*
Baz baz;
struct Baz
{
auto opAssign(int value)
=> baz = value;//*/
int baz;
}
}
void main()
{
Foo foo;
foo.bar = 7;
foo.baz = 42;
imported!"std.stdio".writeln(foo); /*
with opAssign() Anonymous
Foo(7, Baz(42)) or Foo(7, 42) */
}
```
Thank you to the creators and maintainers of the D.
SDB@79
I literally don't understand what your code does
I'm not sure this is related to my suggestion
