On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 01:16:29 UTC, Boaz Ampleman wrote:
I'm not a big fan of using declarations as type either:```d bool doWeWantThat( struct{ int notsure;} p) { return false; } ```
Here `(int notsure) p` would read much better. And we want tuple syntax in the language anyway so we can do destructuring.
in the same way, named fields in tuples is an aberration to me, because "why not use a struct instead ?"
When it's a singleton type used in a place you can't declare a struct. Naming tuple fields makes for clearer code rather than having to remember an index in code reviews to decipher what's happening.
