On Thursday, 23 October 2025 at 12:38:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 23 October 2025 at 02:06:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[snip]
So the problem wasn't solved, just moved from the public API
to the internal API. Since it's no longer user-facing, those
overloads really should be separately-named functions instead
IMNSHO. Not 50 overloads on `toImpl`.
T
What's the advantage of making them separately-named functions?
1. Easy to search for/jump to implementation
2. No need template constraint(s) -> faster compile
Happy coding
