"Alexander" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > On 15.05.2011 06:42, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> All of that *was considered acceptable practice*. But the fact they found >> it >> acceptable obviously doesn't change the fact that those are horrible >> practices: it just meant they were a bunch of complete fucking amateur >> morons. > > Until and unless we have clear definition of "good practice", which is > acceptable and practiced my majority, the definition of "good" and "bad" > is purely point of view and extremely subjective. >
And like I said at the beginning, the old-style-PHP/ASP of mixing code and HTML is one of the things that *HAS* become widely accepted as bad practice. Just because there are some amateurs and incompetent "professionals" around that still don't know any better doesn't change that fact. > > You don't think so? Good, follow whatever you believe is good - no > questions, no problems. Just recognize that there are many people and many > opinions and practices, which are good or bad for any particular > application - that's all. > Ugh, I never could stand that hippie rhetoric. Despite what society's been brainwashed into believing, there *ARE* opinions out there that are just plain moronic, and yes, *wrong*.
