On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:52:58 +0200, csci <c...@nowhere.com> wrote:
I noticed in the D spec it states that
"Function template type parameters that are to be implicitly deduced may
not have
specializations"
However, the following code works:
void Foo(T : double)(T t) { writefln("%f",t+2); }
...
Foo(5.5);
I was wondering if this is behavior that can be relied upon, or if it
may change
in the future? Or am I misreading things?
It would very much seem you are correct in your interpretation. I
question however, the validity of that part of the spec.
In short, it works now, and I see no reason for that not to work.
--
Simen
