On 14-09-2011 11:47, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:38:38 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
What OS are you on? On 32-bit Linux, it should just work. On 64-bit

Linux,

there's a bug which makes it so that you don't get one. If you're on
Windows (which I'm guessing that you're not since you're talking about
segfaults rather than access violations), then I believe that it should
just work, but there might be something that you have to do to get it

to

work (I don't use Windows much, so I'm not sure).

- Jonathan M Davis

64 bit linux :-(. Thank you for your fast response.

Actually. wait. I wasn't thinking right. You never get a backtrace from a
segfault. There _is_ a bug on 64-bit Linux which makes it so that backtraces
don't work, but you don't get a stacktrace from a segfault regardless. The way
to handle that is to get a core dump and use gdb on it. However,
unfortunately, 64-bit programs generated by dmd don't seem to be work with gdb
(though 32-bit programs will). It's a result of the fact that 64-bit support
for dmd is pretty new. Still, they're annoying bugs.

In any case, the best way to handle your problem would probably be to compile
your program as 32-bit, run it with core dumps enabled, and use gdb on it.
That should show you where the problem is unless the segfault is 64-bit
specific for some reason.

- Jonathan M Davis

As an aside, I still think DMD needs an option to insert null checks everywhere, at least for debugging...

- Alex

Reply via email to