On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:01:07 -0400, simendsjo <[email protected]> wrote:
On 24.10.2011 17:23, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:32:34 -0400, simendsjo <[email protected]>
wrote:
What does shared for functions mean? I thought it was supposed to
automatically synchronize access, but this doesn't seem to be the case.
void f() shared {
// no synchronization
}
void f() {
synchronized {
// do stuff
}
}
Shared functions do not affect the function. All they do is affect the
'this' pointer.
This:
struct S
{
void f() shared {}
}
is roughly equivalent to this:
struct S
{}
void f(shared ref Foo this){}
-Steve
So you cannot create a function to be called on both shared and unshared
instances? For mutable/immutable there's const, but there is no
"maybeShared".
No. There isn't a hybrid that works as well as const does. I suspect one
could be created, but it's very infrequent that you want to work with
shared data in the same way you want to work with unshared data. With
immutable vs. immutable, const incurs no penalty.
But for shared vs. unshared, there is a very real penalty for obeying
shared semantics.
-Steve
