On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:52:19 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
> Expected, s has value semantics.
>
> for(S _s=s; !_s.empty(); _s.popFront()){
> auto i = _s.front();
> // assert(i == s.popCount()); // expected to fail.
> }Yes thank you. I was just hoping to have access to _s inside the loop. And yeah, it likely would break lots of code. Granted I kind of wish all ranges would be consumed unless specifying save().
