On 12/3/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote: > That page says that reads and writes are guaranteed to be atomic for shared. > It does _not_ say that something like ++threadsCount is guaranteed to be > atomic.
Woops, sorry it was a typo. I meant page 411, not 413. It says it's an error there. Btw, I never said ++ was atomic, I've asked whether something has changed. IOW I thought perhaps this used to be an error but maybe it was changed to make increment/decrement to be atomic on shared variables. That's not the case of course..
