On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, at 01:16 PM, Mike Parker wrote: > On 1/10/2012 10:57 PM, DNewbie wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Mike Parker wrote: > >> > >> Those samples use a binding to the Win32 API[1] that does not ship with > >> DMD. So in your case, std.c.windows.windows is probably what you want > >> for now. > >> > >> > >> [1]http://dsource.org/projects/bindings/wiki/WindowsApi > >> > > > > Ok.. I still don't understand why such a 'binding' is needed. > > Is std.c.windows.windows not enough for everyone? > > > > Unfortunately, no. It is not a complete binding of the Win32 API. It has > a lot of stuff, but if you need more you need to look elsewhere. Andrej > hit on some of the deficiencies in his post. >
Understood. I think I'll go with the binding. Thnk you.
