On Saturday, January 21, 2012 14:38:56 Gour wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:42:18 -0800 > > Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote: > > 5. @safe (and therefore SafeD) isn't fully implemented. So, it > > doesn't necessarily work quite like it's supposed to yet. > > This one is really interesting for our use of D, so we wonder if there > is some estimation when SafeD will be available?
It's partially available. It just isn't fully implemented, and I don't know what's missing from it. And I have no idea when it will be fully implemented. You can certainly use it now, but I don't know how much you can really mark as @safe at this point, and I don't know how accurate the compiler is in determining what's @safe beyond the simple restriction that it can't call functions which aren't @trusted or @safe. - Jonathan M Davis