On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 05:19:52AM +0200, Mantis wrote: > 18.02.2012 2:50, H. S. Teoh пишет: > >... > You cannot have ref local variable, so e is a copy in any case. It > may be a class reference or a pointer, so calling potentially > non-const methods is probably not safe here, but assignment > shouldn't give you problems.
But that's the problem, if e is a dynamic array, then it can potentially be modified through the original reference after being assigned. Ideally, I'd need e to be a reference to an immutable type. But that requires a way of converting an arbitrary type to its immutable form, which I don't know how to do in a generic way. T -- Let's eat some disquits while we format the biskettes.
